Monday, September 20, 2021

Let's talk infectious diseases, the reason for vaccines: ᴬⁿᵗʰʳᵃˣ


Anthrax is a serious infectious disease caused by bacteria known as Bacillus anthracis.

Anthrax can be found naturally in soil and commonly affects domestic and wild animals around the world. Although it is rare in the United States, people can get sick with anthrax if they come in contact with infected animals or contaminated animal products. Anthrax can cause severe illness in both humans and animals.

People get infected when anthrax spores get inside the body and they “activate.” When they become active, the bacteria can multiply, spread out in the body, produce toxins, and cause severe illness. This can happen when people breathe in spores, eat food or drink water that is contaminated with spores, or get spores in a cut or scrape in the skin.


There are four types of anthrax and the type of illness a person develops depends on how anthrax enters the body. Typically, anthrax gets into the body through the skin, lungs, or gastrointestinal system. All types of anthrax can eventually spread throughout the body and cause death if they are not treated with antibiotics.

Cutaneous anthrax is the most common form of anthrax infection, and it is also considered to be the least dangerous. Without treatment, up to 20% of people with cutaneous anthrax die. However, with proper treatment, almost all patients with cutaneous anthrax survive.

Inhalation anthrax is considered to be the most deadly form of anthrax. Infection usually develops within a week after exposure, but it can take up to 2 months. Without treatment, inhalation anthrax is almost always fatal. However, with aggressive treatment, about 55% of patients survive.

When a person eats raw or undercooked meat from an animal infected with anthrax, they can develop gastrointestinal anthrax. Gastrointestinal anthrax has rarely been reported in the United States. Without treatment, more than half of patients with gastrointestinal anthrax die. However, with proper treatment, 60% of patients survive.

Recently, another type of anthrax infection has been identified in heroin-injecting drug users in northern Europe. This type of infection has never been reported in the United States.

During the 1800s, doctors saw cases of anthrax but did not yet have a diagnosis for the disease. During this time, the organism that causes anthrax had not yet been discovered, but doctors had noticed a link between the disease and the animal hair industry. Because of this, the disease became known as “wool sorters disease.”

In 1877 Robert Koch studied Bacillus anthracis, from these studies, he was able to determine the life cycle of the anthrax bacteria, and was able to demonstrate what became known as Koch’s postulates, which demonstrate a causal relationship between a specific microorganism and a disease.

Louis Pasteur took Koch’s work a step further, trying to fully prove how anthrax was spread and how it made people or animals sick. Pasteur also worked to create a vaccine for anthrax. In his experiment, Pasteur gave 25 animals two shots of an anthrax vaccine he had created with weakened anthrax bacteria. After he gave both rounds of the vaccine to these animals, he injected them with live anthrax bacteria. He also injected live bacteria into 25 other animals that had not been vaccinated. Each of the vaccinated animals survived, while the 25 that were not vaccinated died.

In the 1950s the first anthrax vaccine for humans was created. This anthrax vaccine was tested in a group of goat hair mill workers. This study determined that the vaccine was 92.5% effective in preventing cutaneous anthrax. After the study, the vaccine was made available to people working in goat hair processing mills in the United States. In 1970 an updated human anthrax vaccine was released, replacing the 1950s vaccine. This is essentially the same vaccine used today.

Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed (AVA) protects against anthrax. It does not contain any anthrax bacteria and cannot give people anthrax. It is not typically available to the general public. It is approved for use in three groups of adults 18 to 65 years of age who may be at risk of coming in contact with anthrax because of their job. To build up protection against anthrax, these groups should get 5 shots of anthrax vaccine over 18 months. To stay protected, they should get annual boosters.


{You can find all the sources I used by clicking here.} 

Let's talk vaccines: ᴴᵉʳᵈ ᴵᵐᵐᵘⁿⁱᵗʸ

Herd immunity occurs when a large portion of a community becomes immune to a disease, making the spread of disease from person to person unlikely. As a result, the whole community becomes protected — not just those who are immune.

Often, a percentage of the population must be capable of getting a disease in order for it to spread. This is called a threshold proportion. If the proportion of the population that is immune to the disease is greater than this threshold, the spread of the disease will decline. This is known as the herd immunity threshold.

What percentage of a community needs to be immune in order to achieve herd immunity? It varies from disease to disease. The more contagious a disease is, the greater the proportion of the population that needs to be immune to the disease to stop its spread. For example, the measles is a highly contagious illness. It's estimated that 94% of the population must be immune to interrupt the chain of transmission.


There are two main paths to herd immunity — infection and vaccines.


𝙽𝚊𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚕 𝚒𝚗𝚏𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗

Herd immunity can be reached when enough people in the population have recovered from a disease and have developed protective antibodies against future infection.

However, there are some major problems with relying on community infection to create herd immunity: reinfection and health impact.






𝚅𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚒𝚗𝚎𝚜

Herd immunity also can be reached when enough people have been vaccinated against a disease and have developed protective antibodies against future infection. Unlike the natural infection method, vaccines create immunity without causing illness or resulting complications.

Herd immunity makes it possible to protect the population from a disease, including those who can't be vaccinated, such as newborns or those who have compromised immune systems.

Herd immunity, or community immunity, as it’s sometimes called, is a powerful public health tool. By ensuring those who can be vaccinated do get vaccinated we can achieve herd immunity and prevent the illness and suffering that comes from the spread of infectious diseases.


{You can find all the sources I used by clicking here.}

Let's talk vaccines: ⱽᵃᶜᶜⁱⁿᵉ ᵀʸᵖᵉˢ

There are several different types of vaccines. Each type is designed to teach your immune system how to fight off certain kinds of germs—and the serious diseases they cause.

When scientists create vaccines, they consider:

▪️How your immune system responds to the germ

▪️Who needs to be vaccinated against the germ

▪️The best technology or approach to create the vaccine

Vaccines are generally classified as live or non-live (sometimes loosely referred to as ‘inactivated’) to distinguish those vaccines that contain attenuated replicating strains of the relevant pathogenic organism from those that contain only components of a pathogen or killed whole organisms. In addition to the ‘traditional’ live and non-live vaccines, several other platforms have been developed over the past few decades.

There are several types of vaccines, including:

▪️Inactivated vaccines

▪️Live-attenuated vaccines

▪️Messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines

▪️Subunit, recombinant, polysaccharide, and conjugate vaccines

▪️Toxoid vaccines

▪️Viral vector vaccines

𝙸𝚗𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚟𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚒𝚗𝚎𝚜 (𝙺𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚎𝚍 𝙰𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚐𝚎𝚗)

Inactivated vaccines use the killed version of the germ that causes a disease. They are made by making a pathogen safe for use in a vaccine by treatment with heat or chemicals. This kills the pathogen, making it incapable of replication, but still allows it to induce an immune response to at least some of the antigens contained within the organism.

Inactivated vaccines usually don’t provide immunity that’s as strong as live vaccines. So you may need several doses over time (booster shots) in order to get ongoing immunity against diseases.

Inactivated vaccines are used to protect against:

▪️Hepatitis A

▪️Flu (shot only)

▪️Polio (shot only)

▪️Rabies

𝙻𝚒𝚟𝚎-𝚊𝚝𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚞𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚟𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚒𝚗𝚎𝚜

Live vaccines use an attenuated form of the germ that causes a disease. (Attenuated means having been reduced in force, effect, or value.) In some cases, microorganisms can be attenuated or disabled so that they lose their ability to cause significant disease (pathogenicity) but retain their capacity for transient growth within an inoculated host. Attenuation can often be achieved by growing a pathogenic bacterium or virus for prolonged periods under abnormal culture conditions.

Because these vaccines are so similar to the natural infection that they help prevent, they create a strong and long-lasting immune response. Just 1 or 2 doses of most live vaccines can give you a lifetime of protection against a germ and the disease it causes.

Live vaccines are used to protect against:

▪️Measles, mumps, rubella (MMR combined vaccine)

▪️Rotavirus

▪️Smallpox

▪️Chickenpox

▪️Yellow fever

▪️Influenza (nasal spray)

▪️Shingles

𝚂𝚞𝚋𝚞𝚗𝚒𝚝, 𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚋𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚗𝚝, 𝚙𝚘𝚕𝚢𝚜𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚍𝚎, 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚓𝚞𝚐𝚊𝚝𝚎 𝚟𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚒𝚗𝚎𝚜

Subunit, recombinant, polysaccharide, and conjugate vaccines use specific pieces of the germ—like its protein, sugar, or capsid (a casing around the germ).

Because these vaccines use only specific pieces of the germ, they give a very strong immune response that’s targeted to key parts of the germ. They can also be used on almost everyone who needs them, including people with weakened immune systems and long-term health problems.

One limitation of these vaccines is that you may need booster shots to get ongoing protection against diseases.

These vaccines are used to protect against:

▪️Hib (Haemophilus influenzae type b) disease

▪️Hepatitis B

▪️HPV (Human papillomavirus)

▪️Whooping cough (part of the DTaP combined vaccine)

▪️Pneumococcal disease

▪️Meningococcal disease

▪️Shingles

▪️Influenza (injection)

𝚃𝚘𝚡𝚘𝚒𝚍 𝚟𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚒𝚗𝚎𝚜

Toxoid vaccines use a toxin (harmful product) made by the germ that causes a disease. They create immunity to the parts of the germ that cause a disease instead of the germ itself. That means the immune response is targeted to the toxin instead of the whole germ.

Like some other types of vaccines, you may need booster shots to get ongoing protection against diseases.

Toxoid vaccines are used to protect against:
▪️Diphtheria
▪️Tetanus

𝚅𝚒𝚛𝚊𝚕 𝚟𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚘𝚛 𝚟𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚒𝚗𝚎𝚜

For decades, scientists studied viral vector vaccines. Some vaccines recently used for Ebola outbreaks have used viral vector technology, and a number of studies have focused on viral vector vaccines against other infectious diseases such as Zika, flu, and HIV. Scientists used this technology to make COVID-19 vaccines as well.

Viral vector vaccines use a modified version of a different virus as a vector to deliver protection. Several different viruses have been used as vectors, including influenza, vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), measles virus, and adenovirus, which causes the common cold. Adenovirus is one of the viral vectors used in some COVID-19 vaccines being studied in clinical trials.

Viral vector vaccines are used to protect against:
▪️COVID-19

𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚎𝚛 𝚁𝙽𝙰 (𝚖𝚁𝙽𝙰) 𝚟𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚒𝚗𝚎𝚜

mRNA vaccines are a new type of vaccine to protect against infectious diseases. To trigger an immune response, many vaccines put a weakened or inactivated germ into our bodies. Not mRNA vaccines. Instead, they teach our cells how to make a protein—or even just a piece of a protein—that triggers an immune response inside our bodies. That immune response, which produces antibodies, is what protects us from getting infected if the real virus enters our bodies.

COVID-19 mRNA vaccines give instructions for our cells to make a harmless piece of what is called the “spike protein.” The spike protein is found on the surface of the virus that causes COVID-19.

Once the instructions (mRNA) are inside the muscle cells, the cells use them to make the protein piece. After the protein piece is made, the cell breaks down the instructions and gets rid of them.

Next, the cell displays the protein piece on its surface. Our immune systems recognize that the protein doesn’t belong there and begin building an immune response and making antibodies, like what happens in natural infection against COVID-19.

At the end of the process, our bodies have learned how to protect against future infection. The benefit of mRNA vaccines, like all vaccines, is those vaccinated gain this protection without ever having to risk the serious consequences of getting sick with COVID-19.

mRNA vaccines do not use the live virus that causes COVID-19.
They do not affect or interact with our DNA in any way. mRNA never enters the nucleus of the cell, which is where our DNA is kept.
The cell breaks down and gets rid of the mRNA soon after it is finished using the instructions.

Future mRNA vaccine technology may allow for one vaccine to provide protection for multiple diseases, thus decreasing the number of shots needed for protection against common vaccine-preventable diseases.

Beyond vaccines, cancer research has used mRNA to trigger the immune system to target specific cancer cells.

Scientists predict that mRNA is going to transform vaccines in the future and it already has with COVID. It's one of the reasons the vaccine was created so fast.




{You can find all the sources I used by clicking here.}

Let's talk vaccines: ᵂʰʸ ᵃʳᵉⁿ'ᵗ ᵛᵃᶜᶜⁱⁿᵉˢ ¹⁰⁰% ᵉᶠᶠᵉᶜᵗⁱᵛᵉ?

Why aren't vaccines 100% effective?

The short answer: Because nothing is.

The longer answer:

Individual immune systems are different enough that in some cases, a person’s immune system will not generate an adequate response. As a result, he or she will not be effectively protected after immunization.

That said, the effectiveness of most vaccines is high. After receiving the second dose of the MMR vaccine (measles, mumps, and rubella) or the standalone measles vaccine, 99.7% of vaccinated individuals are immune to measles. The inactivated polio vaccine offers 99% effectiveness after three doses. The varicella (chickenpox) vaccine is between 85% and 90% effective in preventing all varicella infections, but 100% effective in preventing moderate and severe chicken pox.

In every single article, every single piece of literature I read - and it has been A LOT - there hasn't yet been a claim that any vaccine is 100% effective. The claim that has been made is that vaccines are our best chance against either never contracting an infectious disease at all or contracting only a mild case.

It's worth noting that natural infection also does not provide 100% protection.

{You can find all the sources I used by clicking here.} 

Let's talk vaccines: ᴬⁿᵗⁱᵇᵒᵈⁱᵉˢ ᶠʳᵒᵐ ⁱⁿᶠᵉᶜᵗⁱᵒⁿ ᵃⁿᵈ ᶠʳᵒᵐ ᵛᵃᶜᶜⁱⁿᵃᵗⁱᵒⁿ

Is there a difference between the antibodies created through natural infection and the antibodies created in response to a vaccine? 

Even though antibodies are important for eliminating and preventing many kinds of infections, not all antibodies the body produces against a virus are effective.

Different B cells in the body will produce multiple different antibodies that bind to different sites on the body. But only binding to some of these sites will actually inactivate the virus. For a vaccine to work, it must produce a neutralizing antibody.

When you develop antibodies through natural infection, your immune system goes through this process of identifying the virus and eventually making effective antibodies. Your B cells make antibodies to different parts of the virus, some of which are effective and some of which are not. These help you eliminate the virus and recover. Hopefully, some of these antibodies also help protect you from future infection.

The process of vaccination allows the formation of the memory B cells, just like they do in natural infection. If you are ever exposed to the virus, these B cells go into action right away and release antibodies that can target the virus. They inactivate the virus before you get sick. Or, in some cases, you might get sick but with a much milder case.

For the most part, the antibodies that you form from getting vaccinated are the same kind of antibodies you would get from a natural infection. One difference is that certain types of vaccines only show the immune system part of the relevant virus. Because of that, the immune system doesn’t form as many different types of antibodies as it would in the course of a natural infection.

However, this doesn’t mean that the antibodies formed are any less effective than those formed in a natural infection. And getting vaccinated gives your immune system a head start over potential infection down the road.


{You can find all the sources I used by clicking here.} 

Let's talk vaccines: ᴼⁿᵉ ˢʰᵒᵗ, ᵐᵘˡᵗⁱᵖˡᵉ ᵈᵒˢᵉˢ, ᵃⁿᵈ ᵇᵒᵒˢᵗᵉʳˢ

So, what's up with the multiple doses and/or booster shots needed? It depends on the disease, the kind of vaccine, and the kind of antibodies created.

Let's first look at the reasons why we might need to receive multiple doses of a vaccine.

▪️For some vaccines (primarily inactivated vaccines), the first dose does not provide as much immunity as possible. So, more than one dose is needed to build more complete immunity. The vaccine that protects against the bacteria Hib, which causes meningitis, is a good example.

▪️For some vaccines (primarily live vaccines), studies have shown that more than one dose is needed for everyone to develop the best immune response. For example, after one dose of the MMR vaccine, some people may not develop enough antibodies to fight off infection. The second dose helps make sure that almost everyone is protected.

▪️In the case of flu vaccines, adults and children (6 months and older) need to get a dose every year because the flu viruses causing disease may be different from season to season. Every year, flu vaccines are made to protect against the viruses that research suggests will be most common. This is the only vaccine, to date, that needs to be received every year to be effective. In fact, to date, this is the only disease that mutates as often as it does. (To date is used because it is still undetermined whether or not the COVID-19 disease will behave in the same way or not.)

Now what about those booster shots?

For some vaccines, after a while, immunity begins to wear off. At that point, a “booster” dose is needed to bring immunity levels back up. For example, in the case of the DTaP vaccine, which protects against diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis, the initial series of four shots that children receive as part of their infant immunizations helps build immunity. But a booster dose is needed at 4-6 years old. Another booster against these diseases is needed at 11-12 years of age. This booster for older children—and teens and adults, too—is called Tdap.

A booster dose serves as a reminder to the immune system. It says, "Hey, remember me? I'm still a potential threat so keep making those antibodies against me!"


{You can find all the sources I used by clicking here.} 

Let's talk vaccines: ᴵᵐᵐᵘⁿⁱᵗʸ

The immune system could be its own series, there's so much to talk about in regards to it. But we aren't going to go *there* so here's some basic info about the immune system as it pertains to our look at vaccines.

There are three types of immunity: innate, adaptive (also called active or acquired), and passive.

Innate immunity is what we are all born with. We are all born with some level of immunity to invaders. Human immune systems, similarly to those of many animals, will attack foreign invaders from day one. This innate immunity includes the external barriers of our body — the first line of defense against pathogens — such as the skin and mucous membranes of the throat and gut.


Active immunity results when exposure to an antigen triggers the immune system to produce antibodies to that disease. Exposure to the disease can occur through infection with the actual disease (resulting in natural immunity), or introduction of a killed or weakened form of the disease through vaccination. Active immunity is long-lasting, and sometimes life-long.

Passive immunity is provided when a person is given antibodies to a disease rather than producing them through his or her own immune system. A newborn baby acquires passive immunity from its mother through the placenta. A person can also get passive immunity through antibody-containing blood products such as immune globulin. Passive immunity lasts only for a few weeks or months.

Vaccines are also called immunizations because it introduces antigens or weakened pathogens to a person in such a way that the individual does not become sick but still produces antibodies. Because the body saves copies of the antibodies, it is protected if the threat should reappear later in life, therefore putting the person in a state of active immunity.

Some people believe that naturally acquired immunity—immunity from having the disease itself—is better than the immunity provided by vaccines. However, natural infections can cause severe complications and be deadly. This is true even for diseases that many people consider mild, like chickenpox. It is impossible to predict who will get serious infections that may lead to hospitalization.

A white blood cell (yellow) is shown here eating an anthrax bacteria (orange).
The white line in the bottom left-hand corner of the slide denotes a 5 micrometer
(one MILLIONTH of a meter) measurement.


{You can find all the sources I used by clicking here.} 

Let's talk vaccines: ᴬⁿᵗⁱᵍᵉⁿˢ ᵃⁿᵈ ᴬⁿᵗⁱᵇᵒᵈⁱᵉˢ

Let's first discuss antigens. What are antigens?




We would tell children, for simplicity's sake, that antigens are germs. They are what make us sick. And we would be right but antigens are a lot more complex than calling them germs.

Antigens, also called immunogens, invade our immune systems and try to diminish our health. When they enter us they are an alert to our immune system that it is being invaded and needs protection.

There are two kinds of antigens. Foreign and auto.

Foreign antigens are exactly what you would suspect. Anything outside of your body that could upset your immune system. And those antigens could be bacterial or viral depending on their origin. Some examples include snake venom, E. coli, COVID, pollen.

Autoantigens originate in the body and do not usually provoke an immune response, except in individuals with autoimmune disorders.

The presence of antigens rouses illness-fighting white blood cells, called lymphocytes. This presence of antigens causes white blood cells to make cells called antibodies to fight against the antigens.

The battle for health has begun.

Antigens entering the body send a warning signal to the immune system. And production by B cells (a type of lymphocyte, or white blood cell) begins. What are B cells producing? Antibodies to fight the antigens.

An antibody (also known as immunoglobin) is a type of protein and there are five specific types, each type of antibody can only bind to one type of antigen. Antibodies are made up of four polypeptide chains, which are arranged in a Y-shape. The constant region is always the same, but the variable region is different depending on the type of antibody. The antigen binds to the antigen binding site at the end of the variable region.

Once the antibodies find the antigen, they bind to it. This triggers a series of actions by the immune system that, ultimately, leads to the destruction of the pathogen or tags it so other immune cells will recognize it.

Here's a quick rundown on the 5 types:

▪️Immunoglobulin G (IgG): This type accounts for around 75% of all antibodies in the human body. They detoxify harmful substances and provide long-term protection.

▪️Immunoglobulin A (IgA): This one is found primarily in mucosal tissues, such as those in the mouth, vagina, and intestines, as well as in saliva, tears, and breast milk. It accounts for 15% of all antibodies in the human body. These antibodies collect antigens and remove them from your body in your mucus or other body fluids.

▪️Immunoglobulin M (IgM): These are the first antibodies made by B cells in response to antigens.

▪️Immunoglobulin E (IgE): This is the antibody responsible for the allergic response that is mostly found in the lungs, skin, and mucosal membranes.

▪️Immunoglobulin D (IgD): This type accounts for only around 0.25% of antibodies in the human body. IgD is important in the early stages of the immune response. Unlike other antibodies, it does not actively circulate but instead binds to B cells to instigate the immune response.

There are two types of man-made antibodies, polyclonal and monoclonal. Both types are laboratory-produced molecules that act as substitute antibodies that can restore, enhance or mimic the immune system's attack on cells.

What happens when the antigen and the antibody meet?

They form a relationship, a close one, called an antigen-antibody complex (also known as an immune complex). The complex works like a lock and key mechanism.

 
 

Once the complex is formed it goes through one of the following steps:

▪️Agglutination: Here, antibodies clump the antigens together which are later destroyed by phagocytes (a type of cell within the body capable of engulfing and absorbing bacteria and other small cells and particles). Thus by clumping them together, phagocytes can detect them more easily.

▪️Precipitation: Here, soluble antigens are precipitated and destroyed by the phagocytes.

▪️Opsonization: In this method, antibodies are coated on microbial surface after which antigen locks in. This makes it more susceptible to phagocytosis.

▪️Neutralization: Here, antibodies blocks or neutralizes the harmful chemicals produced by antigens. These are later destroyed again by phagocytosis.

▪️Complement Activation: Once the lock and key mechanism perfectly fits into the place, it leads to cell lysis (the disintegration of a cell by rupture of the cell wall or membrane.)

The ratio of antigen to antibody determines size and shape of immune complex. This, in turn, determines the effect of the immune complex.

The distinct functions of antigens and antibodies are used to create tests and vaccines that help detect and combat illness and disease.

Once the antigen turned pathogen is destroyed and the person recovers, a few of the B cells that produced the antibodies stick around. These are known as memory cells because they remember the pathogen and can quickly produce new antibodies against it.

If the memory cells encounter the pathogen a second time, the immune system can fight it off much more quickly. By doing this, they can get rid of the pathogen before the person even becomes sick. When this happens, the person is said to be immune to that particular pathogen.

Vaccines boost the number of antibodies in your body against a specific antigen. When a vaccine enters your body, your B-cells respond as if a naturally occurring antigen has attacked your body. The B-cells respond to the vaccine by reproducing themselves to form an army of cells that are programmed to react to the antigens in the vaccine.

The antibodies created by the vaccine lie dormant in your body until you contract an infection from that antigen, and then they are called to action.

If you contract an infection, antibodies called memory B cells quickly reproduce and make the specific antibodies you need to destroy that antigen.

The memory B-cells’ response is called a secondary immune response, and it’s much faster and more effective than the reaction your body would have to the infection if you had not been vaccinated.


{You can find all the sources I used by clicking here.} 

Monday, September 13, 2021

Let's talk vaccines: ᴴᵒʷ ᵃʳᵉ ᵛᵃᶜᶜⁱⁿᵉˢ ᵈᵉᵛᵉˡᵒᵖᵉᵈ?

It starts in a lab, where scientists work to understand a pathogen and figure out how they could trigger the immune system to produce antibodies against it. When they identify a substance they think could work (an antigen), they start by testing it in cell cultures and then animals.

If the vaccine triggers an immune response, it is then tested in human clinical trials in three phases.

Phase 1

The vaccine is given to a small number of volunteers to assess its safety, confirm it generates an immune response, and determine the right dosage. Generally in this phase vaccines are tested in young, healthy adult volunteers.

Phase 2

The vaccine is then given to several hundred volunteers to further assess its safety and ability to generate an immune response. Participants in this phase have the same characteristics (such as age, sex) as the people for whom the vaccine is intended. There are usually multiple trials in this phase to evaluate various age groups and different formulations of the vaccine. A group that did not get the vaccine is usually included in the phase as a comparator group to determine whether the changes in the vaccinated group are attributed to the vaccine, or have happened by chance.

Phase 3

The vaccine is next given to thousands of volunteers – and compared to a similar group of people who didn’t get the vaccine, but received a comparator product – to determine if the vaccine is effective against the disease it is designed to protect against and to study its safety in a much larger group of people. Most of the time phase three trials are conducted across multiple countries and multiple sites within a country to assure the findings of the vaccine performance apply to many different populations.

During phase two and phase three trials, the volunteers and the scientists conducting the study are shielded from knowing which volunteers had received the vaccine being tested or the comparator product. This is called “blinding” and is necessary to assure that neither the volunteers nor the scientists are influenced in their assessment of safety or effectiveness by knowing who got which product.

Once a vaccine has reached the pre-approval stage following clinical trials, it is assessed by the relevant regulatory body for compliance with quality, safety, and efficacy criteria.

Once authorized, manufacturing begins to scale up. The antigen is weakened or deactivated. To form the full vaccine, all ingredients are combined.

Once the vaccine has been made in bulk quantities, it is bottled in glass vials and then carefully packaged for safe cold storage and transport.

Vaccine packaging must be able to withstand extreme temperatures, as well as the risks involved in being transported globally. Therefore, vaccine vials are most commonly made from glass, as it is durable and able to maintain its integrity in extreme temperatures.

When a vaccine is too hot or too cold, it becomes less effective or even inactive. If stored at the incorrect temperature, vaccines can be ruined or unsafe for use. Regular refrigerators cannot maintain an even temperature consistently, so specialized medical refrigerators are required for these precious products.

To maintain this cold chain, vaccines are shipped using specialized equipment that does not compromise the integrity of the product. Once shipments land in the destination country, refrigerated lorries transport the vaccines from the airport to the warehouse cold room. From there, portable iceboxes are used to transport vaccines from the cold room to regional centres where they’re stored in refrigerators. If vaccination takes place outside of the regional facility, the final step often requires portable iceboxes to transport the goods to local areas for vaccination campaigns. New technologies have invented some portable devices that can keep vaccines at their cold temperature for several days without needing electricity.

Once vaccines start being administered, the safety of the vaccine is paramount, with regular assessments and post-approval clinical studies to report on its safety and effectiveness.


{You can find all the sources I used by clicking here.} 

Let's talk vaccines: ᵂʰᵃᵗ ᵃʳᵉ ᵗʰᵉ ⁱⁿᵍʳᵉᵈⁱᵉⁿᵗˢ ⁱⁿ ᵃ ᵛᵃᶜᶜⁱⁿᵉ?

Vaccines contain tiny fragments of the disease-causing organism or the blueprints for making the tiny fragments. They also contain other ingredients to keep the vaccine safe and effective. These latter ingredients are included in most vaccines and have been used for decades in billions of doses of vaccines.

Each vaccine component serves a specific purpose, and each ingredient is tested in the manufacturing process. All ingredients are tested for safety.

𝙰𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚐𝚎𝚗

All vaccines contain an active component (the antigen) which generates an immune response, or the blueprint for making the active component. The antigen may be a small part of the disease-causing organism, like a protein or sugar, or it may be the whole organism in a weakened or inactive form.

𝙿𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚟𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚜

Preservatives prevent the vaccine from becoming contaminated once the vial has been opened, if it will be used for vaccinating more than one person. The most commonly used preservative is 2-phenoxyethanol. It has been used for many years in a number of vaccines, is used in a range of baby care products and is safe for use in vaccines, as it has little toxicity in humans.

𝚂𝚝𝚊𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚣𝚎𝚛𝚜

Stabilizers prevent chemical reactions from occurring within the vaccine and keep the vaccine components from sticking to the vaccine vial. Stabilizers can be sugars (lactose, sucrose), amino acids (glycine), gelatin, and proteins (recombinant human albumin, derived from yeast).

𝚂𝚞𝚛𝚏𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚜

Surfactants keep all the ingredients in the vaccine blended together. They prevent settling and clumping of elements that are in the liquid form of the vaccine. They are also often used in foods like ice cream.

𝚁𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚞𝚊𝚕𝚜

Residuals are tiny amounts of various substances used during manufacturing or production of vaccines that are not active ingredients in the completed vaccine. Substances will vary depending on the manufacturing process used and may include egg proteins, yeast, or antibiotics. Residual traces of these substances which may be present in a vaccine are in such small quantities that they need to be measured as parts per million or parts per billion.

𝙳𝚒𝚕𝚞𝚎𝚗𝚝

A diluent is a liquid used to dilute a vaccine to the correct concentration immediately prior to use. The most commonly used diluent is sterile water.

𝙰𝚍𝚓𝚞𝚟𝚊𝚗𝚝

Some vaccines also contain adjuvants. An adjuvant improves the immune response to the vaccine, sometimes by keeping the vaccine at the injection site for a little longer or by stimulating local immune cells.

The adjuvant may be a tiny amount of aluminium salts (like aluminium phosphate, aluminium hydroxide, or potassium aluminium sulphate). Aluminium has been shown not to cause any long-term health problems, and humans ingest aluminium regularly through eating and drinking.

Once a vaccine is in use, it must be continuously monitored to make sure it continues to be safe.


{You can find all the sources I used by clicking here.} 

Let's talk vaccines: ˢᵐᵃˡˡᵖᵒˣ ᴱʳᵃᵈⁱᶜᵃᵗᵉᵈ

 


On May 8, 1980 The World Health Assembly accepted the WHO Global Commission’s recommendation and declared the world free from smallpox. No cases of naturally occurring smallpox have happened since.

The declaration marked the end of a disease that had plagued humanity for at least 3000 years, killing 300 million people in the 20th century alone. The world got rid of smallpox thanks to an incredible demonstration of global solidarity, and because it had a safe and effective vaccine.

Smallpox eradication offers hope for efforts to eliminate other infectious diseases, including polio, which is now endemic in just two countries. To date, 187 countries, territories and areas have been certified free of Guinea worm disease, with seven more to go. And the fight against malaria has so far resulted in 38 countries and territories certified as malaria-free. In the case of Tuberculosis (TB), 57 countries and territories with low TB incidence are on track to reach TB elimination.

Without an effective treatment against a disease, there is no possibility of eradicating it. There are only two ways to accomplish this. 

(1) Preventative, such as vaccination.

(2) Curative, such as drugs that can completely eliminate the pathogen that causes the disease from its host. 

And it is for those reasons that vaccines are vital to global health.

WHO Director-General, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said, “As the world confronts the COVID-19 pandemic, humanity’s victory over smallpox is a reminder of what is possible when nations come together to fight a common health threat.”

Let's talk vaccines: ᵀʸᵖᵉˢ ᵒᶠ ⱽᵃᶜᶜⁱⁿᵉˢ

There are four types of vaccines currently available:

(1) Live virus vaccines use the weakened (attenuated) form of the virus. The measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine and the varicella (chickenpox) vaccine are examples.

(2) Killed (inactivated) vaccines are made from a protein or other small pieces taken from a virus or bacteria. The whooping cough (pertussis) vaccine is an example.

(3) Toxoid vaccines contain a toxin or chemical made by the bacteria or virus. They make you immune to the harmful effects of the infection, instead of to the infection itself. Examples are the diphtheria and tetanus vaccines.

(4) Biosynthetic vaccines contain manmade substances that are very similar to pieces of the virus or bacteria. The Hepatitis B vaccine is an example.

In some cases, like with the MMR vaccine, you need more than one dose of a vaccine to build strong immunity. With others, like the tetanus vaccine, your immunity wears off over time and you need occasional “booster” vaccines. In the case of the flu vaccine, the main targets of the immune response shift slightly from year to year, depending on which flu virus strains are circulating most that year, so you need a vaccine every year.


{You can find all the sources I used by clicking here.} 

Let's talk vaccines: ᴴᵒʷ ᵈᵒ ᵛᵃᶜᶜⁱⁿᵉˢ ʷᵒʳᵏ?

You encounter thousands of germs every day. While your immune system can fight most of them on its own, vaccines help it fight the disease-causing ones (pathogens) it can’t handle.

Vaccines familiarize your immune system — which makes antibodies to defend your body against harmful invaders — with a certain pathogen so that it will know what to do if you become infected with that pathogen in the future.

It’s important to note that vaccines don’t make you sick with the pathogen they’re designed to protect you from. Rather, they give your immune system a practice run at taking out a weaker, inactivated, or partial version of the pathogen.

There are several different ways that vaccines can achieve this triggering of the immune system. They contain either:

▪️A weakened (attenuated) form of a pathogen.

▪️An inactivated form of a pathogen.

▪️Certain parts of the pathogen, such as its proteins.

▪️A weakened toxin made by the pathogen.

Vaccines may also contain other ingredients such as adjuvants, which help boost your body’s immune response to the vaccine, and stabilizers, which keep the active ingredients working after the vaccine is made.

Most vaccines won’t prevent you from becoming infected with a certain pathogen. Rather, they allow your body to stop the infection before you get sick, or they prevent you from becoming seriously sick when you get infected.

This helps you, and it also helps those around you, including people in your community who can’t be vaccinated because of serious allergies or a medical condition that weakens their immune system. Pathogens can spread quickly from person to person. When a large number of people in a community are vaccinated, the pathogen can’t spread as easily.



{You can find all the sources I used by clicking here.} 

Let's talk vaccines: ᴬᵈᵛᵃⁿᶜⁱⁿᵍ ᴰᵉᵛᵉˡᵒᵖᵐᵉⁿᵗˢ ⁱⁿ ᵗʰᵉ ˢᵐᵃˡˡᵖᵒˣ ⱽᵃᶜᶜⁱⁿᵉ

 


The smallpox outbreaks overwhelmingly exceeded the number of cows infected with cowpox available to harvest from. In order to create enough vaccines to meet the need advances in vaccine production started. 

In 1876 the New York Board of Health established a vaccine farm in Lakeview, New Jersey. Lymph from calves infected with cowpox virus was harvested and used as vaccine. 

In 1881 government production of nonhumanized vaccine lymph by serial propagation in calves began in London. The vaccine was distributed to public vaccinators.

Around 1898 developments such as the addition of glycerin to vaccine lymph, the increasing regulation of pharmaceutical suppliers, and the advancements of microbiology led to the generally increasing safety of the vaccine supply.

In 1909 at the Vaccine Institute in Paris, Lucien Camus dried smallpox vaccine pulp in an evacuated chamber, removing all of the moisture from the sample. Such air-dried vaccines were used in tropical areas, where the temperature would destroy non-dried vaccine material. But in 1918 they improved on the air-dried version by producing a freeze-dried vacuum-packed vaccine which was used in both French Guiana and the French tropical colonies. Its use continued for decades and became crucial to widespread vaccination programs in tropical areas in the 1970s.

These advancements in smallpox vaccines paved the way for future vaccines for a variety of infectious diseases.


{You can find all the sources I used by clicking here.} 

Let's talk vaccines: ᵀʰᵉ ᴴⁱˢᵗᵒʳʸ ᵒᶠ ⱽᵃᶜᶜⁱⁿᵉˢ

Buckle up, we are taking a road trip to discover vaccines. 

A great place to start talking about vaccines is at the beginning. And chances are good the beginning is not where any of us think it is.

Throughout history, there have been many illnesses and diseases. But two have caused perhaps the most deaths and illnesses throughout the whole of time. Measles and Smallpox. Thought to be the "same" thing, in 0910 a Persian physician was the first to publish a written account titled “On Smallpox and Measles” in which he describes the two diseases as being distinct and unique from each other. Which meant that two different ways of treating them would be needed, based on their specific characteristics.

But the story of vaccines does not begin with the first vaccine in 1798 - Edward Jenner’s use of material from cowpox pustules to provide protection against smallpox. Rather, it begins with the long history of infectious disease in humans, and in particular, with early uses of smallpox material to provide immunity to that disease.

Evidence exists that the Chinese employed smallpox inoculation (or variolation, as such use of smallpox material was called) as early as 1000 CE. In the late 1600s Emperor K'ang Hsi, who had survived smallpox as a child, had his children inoculated.

There were two methods of inoculation known to be used in those days. Grinding up smallpox scabs and blowing the matter into the nostril or scratching matter from a smallpox sore into the skin.

As infectious diseases swept through nations the need for a way to halt these diseases and treat them was being pursued. The Chinese method of inoculation hadn't caught on and/or people were suspicious of its ability to stop the disease. Smallpox and measles were joined by epidemics of pertussis (whooping cough), typhoid fever, diphtheria, yellow fever, scarlet fever, cholera, and polio...to name a few.

According to historical records, between 1545 and 1817 various parts of the world experienced smallpox, whooping cough, measles, typhoid fever, diphtheria, and yellow fever epidemics.

An epidemic is a disease that affects a large number of people within a community, population, or region. A pandemic is an epidemic that's spread over multiple countries or continents.

Presumably, due to an increase in travel and transportation advancements, pandemics became the concern starting with a cholera outbreak in 1817 that swept through India, Asia, and then traveled throughout the world leading to seven major cholera pandemics, each lasting several years, between 1817 and present day. Yes! Present-day!

Prior to the gaining popularity of early inoculation methods, the treatment for these diseases consisted of quarantining, providing comfort measures, attempting to bring down high fevers, bloodletting, inducement of vomiting, alcohol-laced with herbs, and praying that the person wouldn't die or suffer from physical damage due to the disease.

Once again, the Chinese made vaccine headlines (figuratively of course) when Emperor K’ang verbalized support for inoculation in a letter to his descendants in 1661. Having survived a case of smallpox before he became Emperor he wrote:

“The method of inoculation having been brought to light during my reign, I had it used upon you, my sons and daughters, and my descendants, and you all passed through the smallpox in the happiest possible manner…. In the beginning, when I had it tested on one or two people, some old women taxed me with extravagance and spoke very strongly against inoculation. The courage which I summoned up to insist on its practice has saved the lives and health of millions of men. This is an extremely important thing, of which I am very proud.”

In the 1700s variolation started to be practiced more and more as word spread that it worked. Fewer people were dying and that was looked upon favorably.

But what's variolation? Isn't it vaccination? Aren't they the same?

 

Variolation (inoculation) served as a natural precursor to the discovery of vaccination. The development, adoption, and improvement of infectious disease responses are messy processes – there's never a single “eureka” event. There always has to be a precursor, or two, before arriving at the end result.

This method of treatment was used strictly with smallpox outbreaks as the disease provided a visible form of the infection to use.

With variolation, a small amount of the pus from a person infected with smallpox was placed into the skin of an uninfected person. The thought was that the disease would then take hold in the previously uninfected person but in a mild form. It was discovered to be less dangerous to contract it through inoculation than to contract it naturally.

This method of safeguarding against dangerous diseases was never risk-free, nor did advocates of the method claim it to be risk-free. But it greatly reduced the mortality rates. Between 1% to 2% of those variolated died as compared to 30% who died when they contracted the disease naturally.

Inoculation gained popularity in the 1700s.

In 1721 Cotton Mather, thanks to the information his African slave provided him, suggested physician Zabdiel Boylston try the inoculation method as an outbreak of smallpox was ravaging Boston. 248 people were variolated and of those 248, 3% - or 6 people - died. Of those left to the disease and vulnerable to its symptoms 14% died. Thus, variolation had come to the Americas.

Meanwhile, across the pond, Lady Mary Wortley Montagu had been introduced to "engrafting" in Turkey and when arriving back in England in 1721 requested it be done to her two-year-old daughter. Her son had been engrafted while they were in Turkey. Thus, variolation had come to England.

Both Mather and Lady Montagu would come under considerable criticism for advocating variolation, a practice that slowly began to spread as its ability to protect against smallpox became apparent even in light of its fatality rates and the discovery that variolated individuals could pass the disease on to others.

In the 1770s rumors began circulating about a disease called cowpox. People who regularly worked with cattle were claiming that their exposure, and subsequent infection, to cowpox inoculated them against smallpox.

Cowpox is an uncommon illness in cattle, usually mild, that can be spread from a cow to humans via sores on the cow. During an infection, dairy workers may have pustules on their hands. Sufferers can spread the infection to other parts of the body.

Around 1774 farmer Benjamin Jesty inoculated his wife and two sons with matter from a cowpox lesion on one of his cows.

Jesty, having already contracted cowpox, believed himself protected from smallpox infection. When a serious smallpox epidemic hit his Dorset village, he, from his “great strength of mind,” took it upon himself to protect his family. His wife and children survived, and the boys, when challenged with smallpox inoculation in 1789, showed no symptoms.

Mr. Jesty, however, had no interest in systematically testing his methods or publishing his results, and so his finding was largely forgotten. Upon his death, his wife had his tombstone inscribed, “the first person (known) who introduced the cow-pox inoculation.”

Twenty-two years after Benjamin Jesty successfully inoculated his family with cowpox to avoid smallpox, Dr. Edward Jenner began testing and creating what would become the world's first vaccine.

In the 1770s Jenner had also heard the rumors about using cowpox to inoculate against smallpox but he was still in the thick of his medical school studies and residency program.

However, in May 1796 Dr. Jenner inoculated eight-year-old James Phipps with matter from a cowpox sore on the hand of a milkmaid. Phipps suffered a local reaction and felt poorly for several days but made a full recovery. So in July 1796, Jenner inoculated Phipps with matter taken from a fresh human smallpox sore, as if he were variolating the boy, in an attempt to challenge the protection from cowpox. Phipps remained healthy.

Jenner next demonstrated that cowpox matter transferred in a human chain, from one person to the next, provided protection from smallpox.

For the next couple of years, Dr. Jenner continued to test his idea on patients and saw great success. He wrote a paper for the Royal Society of his findings but they rejected it. So Jenner self-published a pamphlet called “An Inquiry into the Causes and Effects of the Variolae Vaccinae, a Disease discovered in some of the Western Counties of England, particularly Gloucestershire, and known by the name of the Cow Pox.” It outlined Jenner’s success in protecting James Phipps from smallpox infection with material from a cowpox pustule, in addition to 22 related cases. At first, the news was received quietly if received at all. But that changed when an associate of Jenner's, Henry Cline, used dried vaccine material provided by Jenner to demonstrate once again that vaccination with cowpox material prevented future smallpox infection.

The vaccine started to gain traction and quickly became preferred over variolation for its improved success and safety.

But, didn't Jenner engraft James Phipps? He took the pus from the infection and placed it under the skin of an uninfected person. That's what people had been doing for years by 1796! So how was what Jenner did different than what everyone else was doing?

So, how are variolation and vaccination different from one another?

Both are using infected pus to infect, in the hopes of immunity, uninfected people.

The difference is subtle but very important. Variolation used viral matter from smallpox patients, usually pus from a light case of smallpox. Jenner's vaccination, meanwhile, used matter from the milder cowpox virus. As a milder disease carrying the same immunities, cowpox matter was much safer. Both methods are also called inoculation because inoculation is the process of introducing a small amount of viral matter into the body in order to teach the body’s immune system to fight off the virus, thus making the patient immune to future infection.

So step one in what would become today's modern vaccination was successfully tested and completed. As is the case with any invention, the first workable treatment would be replaced with an improved option and that cycle would continue until we arrived at the year 2020 and the need for a new vaccine presented itself.

But, that part of the story is much later.

Between Jenner's successful test run of the smallpox vaccine in 1796 and 1879, the vaccine creation and delivery methods stayed the same. In order to meet the demand vaccine farms were created, voices of government endorsed the method, variolation was outlawed in certain parts of the world, and other infectious diseases were being dissected in hopes of developing vaccines.

In the last decade of Jenner's life smallpox mortality rates in Britain declined by approximately 43% thanks to the vaccine.

So what happened in 1879 to push the vaccine forward yet again toward what we know it as today?

What happened was Louis Pasteur was born in 1822.

Between his birth in 1822 and 1879, Pasteur grew up and became an accomplished academic. In 1831 he witnessed firsthand a rabies outbreak and that gave him the desire to solve that problem as well as others. Between 1840 and 1847 Pasteur earned at least 4 degrees. He was found in 1849 teaching Chemistry. In 1854 Pasteur began studying fermentation which would end up being crucial to the next step in modernizing vaccines. Despite a stroke that left his left arm and leg permanently paralyzed, Pasteur persevered in his research and produced the first laboratory-developed vaccine in 1879. It was a vaccine for chicken cholera (Pasteurella multocida).

A happy accident led to this step in vaccine production as Pasteur's assistant didn't follow instructions and the bacteria was exposed to oxygen. Turned out that the oxygen exposed bacteria weakened the disease enough to make it effective in providing protection against the full-strength bacteria.

When Louis Pasteur died in 1895 his life's work had accomplished advancements in vaccine production; he had proved that germs cause disease; he developed vaccines for anthrax and rabies, and he created the process of pasteurization.


{You can find all the sources I used by clicking here.} 

Saturday, October 12, 2019

Trading in FOMO for JOMO


I'm an introvert so I don't mind missing out on things. But social media has been different, it's changed me in ways I'm uncomfortable with. 

At first, it was just a way to stay in touch with people. But then, with its growing population came content. So much content that it's overwhelming and it makes one feel as if they are missing out if they don't keep up with all the content. 

It has the ability to make people feel unimportant if they don't know someone's latest status update. 

For something that was supposed to increase our social interaction it has ironically isolated us and diminished our ability to be authentically social. 

It's created weird popularity contests and fake personas. 

It's introduced fear into our lives. Fear that we can't keep up with "the Jones' " whose life looks so perfect in all those pictures shared, I mean do they ever not smile? Actually, yes. They don't smile more than they do but who wants to see that? So the smiles get shared and the comparisons get drawn. But if all you and I see are the smiles we are forced to conclude that the Jones' are incredibly happy and successful and fill in the blank

It's introduced a whole new platform for rude, crude, and disrespectful behavior. People have forgotten their manners when *interacting* on social media. As people log in to their accounts it seems like they put their humanity on hold and forget that who they will be interacting with is a human as well. 

It's become a battle ground for all the biggies and then things that shouldn't be big but are made so by the attention they receive on social media. 

It is a hotbed of misinterpretation, innuendo, assumptions, false information, and one-up-man-ship. 

But I didn't want to miss any of it. I wanted to be in the know of who said what to whom and what the relationship status is of so and so and how the most recent catastrophe was gaining attention and and and. The list goes on like that damn energizer bunny. 

And then I wanted to miss it all. I couldn't breathe. It was, it is, too much. TOO MUCH. My phone was dinging with notifications, my computer would (it seemed) open up on to Facebook, I felt behind (with what I'm not sure) if I didn't check in a couple times an hour at least. (Pst. Nothing had changed that was significant.) In 2009, 2012, and 2016 I went overseas and my ability to check in on social media was zero to limited. It was a huge relief. HUGE. It was a relief to not think about what kind of insightful, quippy, and/or meaningful status I was going to post. It was a relief to get a break from all the content that populated my home page feed. It was a relief to remember there was life apart from social media. It was a relief to know I could miss out because I wasn't really missing out on what mattered. 

In 2018 I took Facebook off my phone completely. I logged out of Facebook and changed all my logins that used Facebook to logins through my email. I removed Facebook from my bookmarks and then left Facebook for a month. It was good, no it was great. Somehow people still managed to get a hold of me and I of them, who knew it could be done outside of social media?! But I came back to it for a couple of reasons. And I was frustrated that I even had the reasons I did. So I started thinking harder and longer about leaving it all together and what that would mean for me and my relationships. I became insanely envious of my brother who hasn't touched Facebook with a ten foot pole and hasn't been sucked into the social media vortex. Lucky guy. I started thinking through what was the most important thing to me about having a Facebook account and could there be a work around? Of course the answer is yes. There is always a work around. It might take some adjustments and transitioning but isn't that just part of life? 

So as we rounded the corner on 2019 and 2020 came into sight, I knew it was time. Listen, I'll be honest people - I can't do another election season on social media. The last one was so brutal that I am still trying to recover from it and no, I'm not joking or exaggerating. That's great if *you* have thick skin and don't care if your humanity is called into question. I'm not like that and frankly I don't want to be. 

FOMO, in my life, is all about missing out of the non-essential things. I sure as hell hope that my tribe knows how to communicate with me outside of social media and will do so when the chips are down and the stakes high in their lives. If you are in my tribe, Facebook should not be our sole means of staying in touch. That's a superficial connection that is easily broken. My tribe and I should have stronger threads holding us together...and I think we do.

So JOMO is my goal. As an introvert, it's a more attainable goal than it may be for others and I still have that twinge of FOMO but I'll get over it, I practically am already. 




Saturday, October 05, 2019

My (MIS)adventures on the yoga mat


I almost suffocated at yoga today. My boobs and my nose met up and my boobs sucked in my nose like they were quicksand grabbing on. I had visions of my obituary reading something to the effect of "she died during an awkward yoga session when her boobs smothered her." I pulled up for air just in time.



Yoga is supposed to increase your awareness. Oh, I'm aware all right.

I'm aware of every roll, every fold, and every inflexible muscle I have. I'm aware that I don't know how to breathe (how I've stayed alive all these years is beyond me) and I am in fact as klutzy as I have thought myself to be. I'm aware of the sweat as it drips down my forehead, travels in a torturous way down my neck and pools between my boobs, all while I'm holding some quivering pose and can't wipe it away.

I'm also aware of my mind. "I can't", "This is ridiculous", "It's too hard", "I'm too big to do this", "I'll never...", and the litany of phrases marches on while I'm trying crow pose...or really almost any pose. I'm aware of my heart beating, not in the physical way but in the emotional sense. It beats and sometimes my eyes tear up and I don't know why. I'm aware I am uncomfortable, not just physically but mentally. I attempt to keep to myself, to make my large body as small as possible. Sometimes that awareness is when my eyes tear up. I'm aware that I am fidgety, distracted, and it's hard to just be.

So I suppose yoga is working. I'm definitely more aware when I'm practicing it.



As I was growing up I was given the impression that yoga was for hippies and it was evil. I'm not joking. In the circles I lived in, yoga was considered "new age" which was evil. So like any good lemming I have spent a good part of my life thinking yoga was bad. Very very bad. And then I decided to not believe that any longer because all of a sudden it didn't seem true and it seemed a little far-fetched that yoga, a practice in which you move your body for health and wellness, was evil.

Around 2012-2013 I started talking about beginning the practice of yoga. I took one class in 2017 and continued to talk about it. July 2019 I finally started, for real, the practice of yoga. It only took me 6-7 years...better late than never I suppose.

I'm an awkward yogi. Okay, I'm not really a yogi but go with it. The point is I'm awkward. For the first few classes I would find my mat folded up underneath me and I couldn't figure out how it had moved. I've figured out that issue but I still find myself more often than not somehow laying on the mat wonky. An aerial view would show the mat and I making an X. I don't know how this happens. A few times I have found myself with my whole lower body not even on the mat. Do I really not understand how to center myself? Well, since I'm so aware now, thanks to yoga, the answer is no I don't. I don't know how to center myself, literally or figuratively. But I'm going to learn.



After I almost suffocated in my boobs today I did a few things I was really proud of. I was in chair pose, I then went into airplane pose with my upper body. The the instructor suggested we raise ourselves up on our toes and balance in the half-chair, half-airplane pose. I immediately thought, "There is no way on God's green earth that's happening" and then I did it. It had to be a fluke. But then I did it again on the next flow. I was inwardly elated. I also did a few other poses today that, at first, I was like "psh, not happening" and then just did them. So I guess something else I'm more aware of is that I can be, and am, wrong about myself. I'm not giving myself enough credit, I can do more than what I think I can.






Monday, June 17, 2019

Why Self-Checkout is the Least of Your Concerns


I think I've heard it all...

"Self-Checkout is stealing jobs from people." NOPE. They aren't.* I work in a original size Target store and we have four self-checkouts (see above picture). Target hires people to specifically oversee the self-checkouts and it's more work and more stress than being a cashier at one register. Why? One person has to oversee four registers versus just one. Trust me, it ain't a cake walk especially when the technology fails or a guest has a question/complaint or it's a rush hour situation.

"Self-Checkout is evil." REALLY? What about human trafficking? Drug problems? Abuses? Systematic racism? Broken educational systems? I could go on and on but hopefully you catch my drift.

"If I can get your employee discount I will use the self-checkout." HUH. Don't be that person. I mean really, don't be an ass.

Listen, I'm pretty sure self-checkout isn't the thing you should be getting your panties in a twist about.

I'm serious.

Self-checkout is going to be the hill you die on? Really? I see people get seriously worked up about the self-checkouts and it makes me wonder...how worked up are they getting about people being abused? Or about people being forced into "modern day slavery"? Or the declining state of the educational system in America? Or the environment? As I said above, I could go on and on but I'm really hoping you are picking up what I'm laying down.

In the big picture is self-checkout the thing to rally against? It's a microscopic presence in your life so why are you expending so much energy on it rather on something that is worth getting worked up about? It is a brain boggler.

So what IS worth getting worked up about? Well I've already mentioned a few things, some of them more than once. And we all have a part. A part, not the whole. It doesn't rest on just our shoulders, it's a shared thing. Think, "What can I do in my own world and circles of influence to create positive change?" Do not think, "What can I do to change every single person on the planet?" One way of being worked up will bring about change, the other way will not - it will just anger and alienate people.

Anger about self-checkouts just anger and alienate people - trust me on this. And it's because in the big picture of life self-checkouts aren't worth an ounce of energy, they shouldn't even hold on a spot on anyone's list of "Things to be Worked Up About." If you are worked up about self-checkouts then you are living a tunnel-vision life. Expand your vision and really see what is worth putting energy toward.

Going to use the self-checkout? I double dare you.


*Don't just take my word for it Forbes and Zip Recruiter (among many others) have both written about it. I mean if you can't believe Forbes when it comes to business then who can you believe?! Are you going to find articles that say it is stealing jobs? Sure BUT for every one article that claims it is stealing jobs there are approximately three than support it not doing so.

Thursday, November 08, 2018

Words Fail Me

I've lost something. Not my mind, although some days it feels like I am. It's my words. I've lost them and I can't find them. Sometimes I catch a glimpse of them and think they might be returning but then they disappear again. 

It's not the words about the weather and my favorite TV show that have been lost. Those are still present. It's the important words. The words that reveal who I am, what I'm thinking, my grief, my joy, my anger, even my indifference. 
Ask me how I am and you'll get an awkward moment of silence before I answer, "I'm fine." Except you and I both know I'm not being totally honest. Here's the thing - I'm not lying. I am fine. But words fail me to elaborate on the always lame "I'm fine" answer. Words fail me to answer in any other way than "I'm fine." I open my mouth and nothing comes out. I can't find any words beyond "I'm fine."  

I noticed this loss of words begin a few years ago. It started with a suppression I was experiencing at my then workplace. My voice - literally and figuratively - was increasingly being squashed and criticized.  In my personal life my voice was changing like one does in puberty - it was cracking and would raise and lower in pitch as I was settling into it. A couple of major events led me to speechlessness by March 2017. And I have yet to gain my speech back. 

Because I feel things - situations, injustices, conflicts - so deeply the words get buried underneath the feelings. There's so much I want to say about it all that I can't say anything at all. I can't find words to adequately express what I'm feeling and thinking and I find myself mute. The words I want to say these days are colored with anger, disgust, disbelief, confusion, judgement and to let loose those words colored with those emotions would be something I would regret. They would hurt people, alienate me from instead of endear me to others, they would not be the model of shalom I am committed to learning and practicing. 

One gift of my failed words is that of listening. Learning to listen is leading me down roads of understanding into people, cultures, faith expressions, genders, politics, and more. Listening has encouraged me to practice critical thinking. Listening has led me to be more like Jesus to people I interact with. 

So "I'm fine" until words return - words that will build up not tear down, words that will introduce life, words that convey the beauty of shalom, words that will be evidence toward the listening I have tried to do. Until then.